Monday, July 10, 2023

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse's Sixth Weekend: The Movie Becomes the #1 Superhero Film of 2023 at the North American Box Office

Ant-Man 3, Shazam 2 and The Flash all flopped hard this year, making it easy enough for Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse to blast right past them on its way up the year's box office charts. Now it has, coming four weeks after Guardians of the Galaxy, managed to nose ahead of it, with $357,648,000 in the till as against Guardians' $357,577,000.

Expect Spider-Man, which pulled in $8 million this past weekend (as against Guardians of the Galaxy 3's $1 million), to continue extending its lead, perhaps by a considerable margin. Where Guardians of the Galaxy 3, after displaying impressive staying power, especially in later weeks, seems bound to sputter out just a little north of $360 million, Spider-Man seems a safe bet for the vicinity of $380 million even in the event of week-to-week drops in the range of 50 percent--and should the drops be more like those of last week's 30.5 percent, get up near $400 million before finishing out.

Especially given the shaky prospects of Captain Marvel 2 and Aquaman 2 later this year it seems to me the movie has a pretty good chance of still holding the #1 crown at the end of the year in the domestic market (though in the international market, where Guardians of the Galaxy 3 has taken in almost 70 percent more than Spider-Man, Star-Lord and friends will still have that title).

* As of this past weekend Guardians of the Galaxy 3 had grossed $482 million internationally, as against Spider-Man's $284 million--interest in that movie not quite catching internationally the way it did domestically (even if the gross there, too, is still an improvement over that of the first animated Spider-Man movie).

Saturday, July 8, 2023

Indiana Jones 5's First Five Days in Release--and the Upcoming Weekend

As noted here Indiana Jones 5 has had its debut--taking in some $60 million domestically during its first three days, and perhaps $84 million over the first five.

Speculating about the movie's course from here on out one can consider the extremes. Top Gun 2 saw a mere 29 percent drop from its first Friday-to-Sunday period to its second--an extremely rare performance for any major film, but especially for a highly anticipated sequel coming out on a major holiday weekend. By contrast The Flash (while not even coming off a holiday weekend) saw a 73 percent drop.

Boxoffice Pro currently expects the film's performance to fall almost exactly midway between the two extremes, with a 53 percent drop from the first Friday-to-Sunday period to the second, giving it $29 million this coming weekend and boosting its domestic total to nearly $126 million.

This would really not be bad, relatively speaking--almost as good as Guardians of the Galaxy 3 had after its debut (a mere 48 percent drop from a non-holiday weekend). Still, even if the movie managed Guardians of the Galaxy 3 legs and roughly tripled its opening weekend gross this would mean just $180 million in the till. If, going by the first ten days rather than the first weekend, we assumed that the film, like Guardians, managed to make an extra two-thirds atop its $126 million take it would still end up with just $210 million--scarcely touching the low end of the already downwardly revised long-range projection the folks at Boxoffice Pro had offered down to the opening weekend ($211 million).

What about the overseas picture? The last two Indiana Jones films managed a roughly 40/60 domestic/international split, which would work out to a global gross of over a half billion in the circumstances ($525 million). However, the film's first three days saw it take in $70 million internationally, which works out to a rough 46/54 percent domestic/foreign split for the period. In combination with the $210 million domestic total this works out to $450-$460 million taken in globally.

Once more, that is about what Solo made in inflation-adjusted terms. And this is in a relatively optimistic scenario of very decent legs at home and abroad. As I remarked, audiences may be kinder than the critics who saw it first (the situation is quite the reverse of what we saw with Indiana Jones 4 at present), and the competition in the coming weeks is not too strong by the season's usual standards, but we also know that this kind of film is very front-loaded, and that by and large it is depending on the fading nostalgia for the series, limiting its potential. The result is that I suspect that come next Sunday Boxoffice Pro's prediction will prove optimistic--and that even if it does not, barring the movie's legs being not merely Guardians of the Galaxy 3-like, but Top Gun-2 like, it will not make much difference to the film's final fate commercially.*

* Top Gun 2 pulled in 5.7 times its initial Friday-to-Sunday gross, which in the case of Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny would work out to an unspectacular but respectable $340 million. Should this go along with the current domestic/foreign split it might have a chance of at least breaking even via revenue from home entertainment, etc.. (With $350 million+ from theatrical rentals, and the equivalent of another 80 percent+ of that from those other revenue streams, the intake would at least be within range of the $600 million that seems likely to be the lowest outlay on the total project going by the formula I discussed here.)

Is the Box Office Becoming More "Top-Heavy?"

To answer the question raised by the title of this post I looked at the data on Box Office Mojo for this century to determine the share of the year's box office gross accounted for by the ten highest-grossing films.

In the decade 2000-2009 they ranged between just over 23 and just under 27 percent of the total, and averaged 25 percent over the whole decade.

In 2010-2014 the take of the top ten movies ranged from 24 to just under 30 percent, with the average for the five-year period 27 percent.

In 2015-2019 the figure, never lower than 31.7 percent (in 2017), averaged 34 percent, dragged up by how in 2019 it ran 38.5 percent.

Of course, the two years after that (2020, 2021) were so chaotic that it was hard to get much sense out of the numbers, but in that year of comparative recovery, 2022, the proportion was higher still, the top ten movies accounting for 52 percent of the total--more than twice as much as in the decade of the '00s ($3.85 billion of the $7.37 billion taken in).

And in 2023 so far the top ten have accounted for an even higher 59 percent of the total box office gross ($2.68 billion of the $4.51 billion collected at last count).

The result is that it seems indisputable that there was a trend toward a more top-heavy box office clearly underway over the twenty-first century's second decade, and especially after 2015, with the pandemic seeming to give it another boost--as, perhaps, it got people out of the habit of going to the theater for anything but the most "must-see" release. Moreover, there seems little sign of the trend reversing, or even slowing, any time soon.

Sunday, July 2, 2023

How Much Money Will Indiana Jones 5 Lose Disney?

We are hearing $295 million as the price tag for producing Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny. Given that the total outlay on a film's production, distribution and promotion tends to run two to three times its production budget it seems reasonable to think the complete bill for this already colossal but much-delayed and heavily hyped production will run to $600-$900 million.

Of course, with the film barely out it is harder to make guesses about revenue--but given its opening weekend it seems unlikely to do much better than a half billion dollars, and could easily take in just $400 million (or even less). Assume (optimistically) the studio gets half that $400 million figure--$200 million. Now consider the home entertainment/TV/streaming revenue. At this level movies rarely match their theatrical grosses through these sources, but even in the event that the film achieves that--making another $200 million here--the movie ends up with some $400 million, as against that $600-$900 million outlay. The result is that a shortfall in the $200 million+ range is far from inconceivable, even if the movie avoids a worst-case outcome.

And in the worst-case outcome . . . we could be talking about twice that or more. (After all, $900 million-$400 million=. . . I don't even want to finish that bit of arithmetic.)

All of this makes the movie a strong contender for Deadline's "biggest box office bombs" competition next year--but admittedly just one in what is already proving a field of very strong contenders for the title this year.

What About Indiana Jones' 5-Day Opening Weekend Gross?

The numbers are already in for Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny's opening weekend--a $60 million gross that would be deemed disappointing for any big Independence Day weekend release, never mind an installment in a classic Lucas-Spielberg saga.

But what about the prospects for the full five-day "weekend?"

Boxoffice Pro, which had down to the film's release anticipated its getting up near $94 million now has it doing not much better than $82 million--which seems to me unlikely to be the last downward revision of projections regarding the film.

Still, the film will have at least one chance to surprise the dismayed and dismaying--next week, when we will see how it holds up. Will good word of mouth offer at least partial compensation for a disappointing opening, the way it did for Guardians of the Galaxy 3? Or will the fall just continue, the way it has for The Flash?

Thoughts, readers?

Who's Watching Indiana Jones 5? (Hint: Old People)

While the press is overwhelmingly focused on the disappointing box office numbers the Boxoffice Pro analysis regarding Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny's debut offers an interesting tidbit about the makeup of the dismayingly small portion of the moviegoing audience that did show up. As their report indicates, just "a quarter of the film’s opening weekend audience was under the age of 25," while "moviegoers above the age of 54" comprise "the title's largest age group with 21 percent of ticket sales."

Presenting my initial speculation about the likely misfire that is this film back in April I wrote that
I think Indy 5 will be the movie that reduces Indiana Jones from the tiny and ultra-exclusive club of "absolute, inarguable, classic, totally failure-proof franchise" to "just another movie franchise" (like Star Wars had become in 2017-2019) and maybe even "franchise old people see mainly out of nostalgia" (like the James Bond films have seemed to be, especially after the Waller-Bridge co-scripted No Time to Die[)].
It thus seems that, just as I had speculated, Indiana Jones 5, like No Time to Die, really is confirming the film series' hanging-on-out-of-nostalgia status--a fact that did not bode well for the Bond film, and also does not bode well for this film, which seems that much less likely to be saved by good legs at the box office as a result.

Indiana Jones 5 vs. Solo: the Opening Weekend Box Office Gross--and Beyond

Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny is presently said to be headed for a $60 million gross--at the bottom end of even the latest, much-lowered range projected by Boxoffice Pro.

At this point further comparisons with prior Indiana Jones films seem pointless. Let us compare the performance with the opening of the film that has been on my mind since I started thinking about Indiana Jones' box office prospects back in April, Solo: A Star Wars Story.

Solo took in $84 million back in 2018--which adjusted for inflation is equal to over $100 million in current prices. The result is that we are, so far, looking not at a Solo-like collapse, but something possibly worse here. Should Indiana Jones 5, like Solo, make about 2.5 times its opening gross domestically it will not much overtop $150 million, never mind the $211 million that Boxoffice Pro predicts as the low end of the range of the film's likely gross (and about the $214 million Solo made in current dollars, never mind the $260 million or so it made in inflation-adjusted, 2023 dollars).

Could Indiana Jones do better than that? There may seem some hope in the Rotten Tomatoes ratings--where the critics' ratings have edged upwards (to 68 percent), and the audience's ratings are more generous still (the "Verified" audience affording an 89 percent score, the "All Audience" score 81 percent), suggesting that many will have a more favorable view of the film than the crowd that got the first look at it at Cannes. The film may also benefit from surprisingly weak competition--the market packed this year not with hits but with flops, such that The Flash will not be much of a rival, while in what is an all too familiar pattern this year Boxoffice Pro is already downgrading its expectations for the next possible rival, Mission: Impossible 7. Still, it is not the launch that might have been hoped for, with very good legs required to get it merely to the $200 million mark, and even Top Gun 2-like endurance not quite getting it to $400 million--all as, again, I see little reason to expect a big boost from overseas. The result is that I think $200 million about as well as it is likely to do domestically, and given the 60/40 international/domestic split on prior Indiana Jones films, $300 million the best that can be reasonably hoped for there, working out to a half billion dollars as the likely ceiling for this one--as it happens, about what Solo did globally in 2023 dollars.

The Mounting List of Flops in the Summer of 2023

As it is already July it does not seem unreasonable to stop and consider the course of the box office this summer.

Guardians of the Galaxy 3, despite the deflation of expectations and a weaker-than-hoped-for debut, managed an $850 million global total--in real terms a decline from its predecessors, but a relatively better performance than the preceding Marvel Cinematic Universe films, and quite enough to make it one of the more profitable films of the year. Meanwhile the sequel to Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse has nearly doubled the original film's domestic gross, while if the international audience is less enthusiastic it is still improving its totals on the first film there as well.

By contrast the other big movies of the summer seem to all be performing somewhere between badly and disastrously. Thus does it go with Fast X, Transformers, The Flash--each of which could well mean a nine-figure loss for their studio. And now Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny is at this point performing no better.

Meanwhile, along with the big action movies the family-oriented animated films, and adaptations of animated films, are suffering--as seen with The Little Mermaid, Elemental, and now something called Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken as well.

Considering this let us allow that every summer has its flops. But the ratio of flops-to-successes, the severity of the flops (as with The Flash), and the qualified nature of such successes as we are seeing (Guardians of the Galaxy 3 is at the least an underperformer when graded on anything but a curve), is really something special, with the big-picture numbers confirming the fact. While this is the first summer since 2019 with a "normal" slate of films, when we adjust the grosses for inflation the overall domestic box office take for May and June is down not just from the 2015-2019 average, but the depressed level of last summer as well (reversing the upward trend seen in January-April).

No matter how loud the claqueurs claque they cannot conceal the fact that things are not going well--and I have little expectation of them getting better this season given that the summer has already given us its "best shot," while the prospects of the most promising movies coming out later this summer, and this year, seem either very finite (as with Mission: Impossible 7, about which Boxoffice Pro is already becoming less bullish), or very shaky indeed (as with Captain Marvel 2 and Aquaman 2), with all this going for the foreign markets as for the United States.

Indeed, considering the situation I recall my suggestion in the first week of May that no live-action movie coming out this year will make a billion dollars. Right now I feel more confirmed in that assessment that ever--and its implications for the beleaguered film industry.

How Much Money Will The Flash Lose?

In a little over a month the media has gone from claquing for The Flash as the "greatest superhero movie ever" to accepting that it is a flop of historic proportions (reflected in its, in its third weekend, having just $99 million collected in North America, less than might have been hoped for in its first two days of release).

Now the question seems to be just how much money will be lost on this proposition.

Well, the formula is familiar enough.

Consider the reported budget--something on the order of $200 million. Double and triple that to get the range of the final bill for production, distribution, promotion.

You get $400 million to $600 million this way.

Now consider what the film seems likely to make at the box office. The prospect of $400 million seems to be receding in the distance, even $300 million. I personally can see it (given its possibly finishing around $110 million domestically and the current 40/60 domestic/international split) topping out somewhere around $275 million. Assume a fairly typical 48 percent goes in the till and you have $130 million or so in worldwide theatrical rentals.

Now what about home entertainment, etc.?

Big movies usually make somewhat less here than they do from theatrical revenues. Even 90 percent (which would work out to just under $120 million) is high. But given how poorly this one did at the box office it may make relatively more than usual there. Assume that it matches its theatrical take from those other sources. Or even does better--that it betters that by 50 percent (the way some small movies do).

You end up with maybe $250 million, at best something in the neighborhood of $300 million.

Against that you have the outlay of $400 million+ (and maybe much more).

The result is that even if the movie is a spectacular home entertainment performer (relative to its theatrical income) it will work out to a nine figure loss for the studio--$100 million, maybe $200 million. I would not even be shocked by a $300 million loss on this one movie.

This would guarantee it the top spot in Deadline's "biggest box office bombs" competition in just about any year but this one.

What Ever Happened to Transformers: Rise of the Beasts at the Box Office?

Back in early May I got in my two cents on Transformers: Rise of the Beasts' box office prospects. My guess, based on the performance of prior films in the once mighty but long declining franchise, and the reported tracking, was a range of $300-$450 million for the global take.

Of course, expectations regarding the film turned upward, and its opening weekend saw the movie overperform a bit--take in $61 million (where the predictions had figured mid-50s, tops). It was a win--but only a small one, as the somewhat stronger-than-expected opening was not followed by commensurately good holds, the decline afterward pretty typical for a front-loaded sequel. The drop from the first weekend to the second was 67 percent--and as of its fourth weekend had only $136 million grossed domestically.

Meanwhile the movie's overseas run was less sensational than for previous Transformers films. Where Transformers 4 and 5, and Bumblebee, tripled and quadrupled their domestic take internationally, Transformers: Rise of the Beasts has not quite doubled it, such that the global total stands at well under $400 million at last check ($381 million), with not much further to go (Japan the last major market in which it as yet to open). As things stand I still expect it to finish well within the range I predicted, which seems to me a significant problem for a reported $200 million production--enough of one to possibly mean a major loss for its studio as, reportedly, it plans to proceed with the sequel.

The First Six Months of 2023 at the Box Office: Hollywood's Post-Pandemic Recovery Going into Reverse?

The first four months of 2023 showed a healthy increase in the domestic box office's total gross over the preceding year--$2.6 billion to $1.9 billion going by the Box Office Mojo data, which works out to a 30 percent boost even after adjustment of the component monthly figures for May 2023 prices. However, even just in current dollars the North American box office took in only marginally more in May and June 2023 ($1.777 billion according to the current, likely to be revised slightly upward figure) than it did in May-June 2022 ($1.755 billion), and, even on a generous adjustment of the figure (assuming zero inflation in June 2023), down at least two percent in real terms from the year.

In other words, recovery was quite evident in the first third of the year, with the first four months of 2023 seeing the box office take in 59 percent of the average for 2015-2019 in the same part of the year, and 64 percent of what was seen in the last "normal," pre-pandemic year of 2019 (as against 46 and 49 percent for the year before, respectively). However, so far this summer it has gone backward. Where the May-June box office in 2022 managed 68 percent of the 2015-2019 average for the same months, and 69 percent of the figure for 2019, in 2023 it has managed just 67 percent of the average for the five-year period, and of the 2019 level.*

I am sure that few expected the box office's recovery, after (if perhaps not going as fast as many would like) still proceeding strongly in the year's first third, going into reverse in the summer season. I certainly did not. Looking at last year's recovering-but-not-all-the-way-there box office my thought was that the summer's revenues reflected the relatively limited slate of films (just four big action movies rather than the usual eight, a fact which seemed to me critical in helping Top Gun 2 rack up its spectacular gross), and my guess was that this year's comparatively would-be-blockbuster-packed summer would complete the normalization, or near-normalization, of the market. But as the flops pile up it appears that this was overoptimistic--and evidence that the road back to profitability for Hollywood is longer and harder than widely appreciated.

It also raises two possibilities.

One is the pandemic's blow to Hollywood being harder than realized--as people continue to avoid theaters because they do not feel safe in them (perhaps to a greater degree than we realize; the media has much more interest in opposition to measures to contain the pandemic than the opposite), or moviegoing suffers for the permanent shutdown of so many theaters, or so many just falling out of the habit of going so they only come out for something really, really, really big.

The other is the extent to which Hollywood has problems besides the pandemic, and which preceded it (even if the pandemic accelerated them)--like its decreasing ability to entice people to the theater with anything but mega-budgeted brand name tentpoles, and the fact that the franchises on which it relies for those tentpoles are ever-more weary. (Putting it bluntly, the sequels and remakes that no one asked for keep coming, even as the audience's willingness to see them declines.) Meanwhile the fact that the consumer is now so hard-pressed--that, as strikes, strikes, strikes everywhere against a backdrop of skyrocketing prices for essentials (you know, like food and housing)--may make them the more hesitant to indulge in a night out at the movies rather than just watching streaming, or anything else, at home. (This, too, is likely a greater factor than appreciated--the media no more interested in consumers' responses to tough times than it is in those still concerned about the virus, least of all the claqueurs of the entertainment press.)

As we consider Hollywood's domestic woes we should also remember that this is a moment in which the international markets are not providing relief--in which, frankly, that biggest and most important piece of that market, China, is ever less lucrative for Hollywood, with a glance a one underperformer after another showing lackluster or worse Chinese ticket sales as a factor. (Ant-Man 3, which may have faded fast in North America but saw its biggest troubles in the international market, took a particularly big hit in China, without which its "flop" status would be a lot more disputed--and this has proven merely the beginning of a long train of disappointments this year, from Fast X to Transformers: Rise of the Beasts as the latest installments in franchises that normally do quite well there bring in disappointingly small amounts of cash.)

The result is that just as the weak grosses of the summer of 2023 (so far) ought not to be trivialized, one should also not trivialize what the summer means for the badly-battered American film industry.

* Even in current dollars Hollywood broke the $3 billion barrier in the year's first four months in every single year of the 2015-2019 period (and blew past $3.8 billion in 2018)--while breaking $4 billion when the figures are adjusted for May 2023 prices.

Is Fast X a Flop?

A little over two months after its world debut (it came out in Italy at the end of April), and over six weeks after its wider launch (in the U.S., China and other key markets), without much further to go, the Fast and Furious sequel Fast X is still short of the $700 million mark. (At last report it in fact had only $691 million grossed.)

The figure is notably lower than what the preceding F9 made during the pandemic-depressed year of 2021 in current dollars ($726 million), never mind inflation-adjusted real dollars ($820 million in May 2023 dollars)--by which measure it is 16 percent down. Compared with the series' last "normal" release, the eighth film The Fate of the Furious it is down by over half in real terms (that movie made $1.24 billion in 2017, equal to $1.54 billion today), and scarcely better than a third of what the franchise made at its peak with Fast Seven in 2015 (over $1.5 billion in real terms, and about $1.95 billion in May 2023 dollars).

The result is that, however much one tries to grade the film's performance on a curve ("Not every movie has to make a billion dollars!" goes the retort), the gross of Fast X has to be recognized as a significant comedown from past films in the franchise--and a problem given that it cost enough to make a $700 million gross a serious problem. With the film's budget reported as $340 million, my guess according to the formula I previously discussed is that even on the most optimistic calculation it needed $800 million+ before getting near the break-even point even after the home entertainment and other revenue streams are counted in, with a billion dollar gross likely a necessity.* (No, not every movie needs to make a billion dollars. But when they cost north of $300 million they don't make much sense as a financial proposition otherwise, and the studio bosses don't make these things for their or anyone else's health.)

Naturally I think the film has a shot at next year's Deadline list of "biggest box office bombs," except that competition is very, very intense here, with the even less well-performing Transformers: Rise of the Beasts, The Flash and other such films also in contention for spots.

Considering that I think Deadline should make the list longer--give us the list out to ten or even more places this year rather than the usual five, just as they do with the most profitable films. (Really, 2023, and especially the summer of 2023, is shaping up to be that bad.)

* Counting in, besides production, promotion and distribution all the way through home entertainment, TV, streaming, etc., a big-budget movie tends to cost its producers at least twice, and often three times, its production budget, giving us a figure in the range of $700 million to $1 billion in the case of a $340 million film. A movie making $700 million or so at the box office might see the equivalent of half that in theatrical rentals (48 percent seems typical these days, so call it $335 million), and perhaps the equivalent of 80-90 percent of that in the post-theatrical outlets, coming to another $240-$280 million or so. This works out to somewhere around $600 million, which can easily leave a nine-figure gap between what was spent and what came in in the form of revenue.

Thursday, June 29, 2023

Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny: Just One Day to Go Before it Hits Theaters (A Note on the Latest Opening Weekend Projection)

Boxoffice Pro has just put out its projection for this coming weekend--and along with the usual projection for three-day Friday-to-Sunday period, also one for the five-day Friday-to Tuesday period created by the long holiday weekend we will get as a result of Independence Day falling on a Tuesday this year.

Of course, the big story here is what Indiana Jones 5 will make. As it happens the range for the weekend now stands at $60-$77 million--which means that the ceiling for the film is now below the floor in Boxoffice Pro's first tracking-based projection four weeks ago ($81-$111 million), which itself had reflected expectations none too high to begin with.*

Their best guess seems to be that the movie will take in something in the middle of that range--$70 million, with all that implies for the Solo-caliber or worse catastrophe scenario I have been discussing here for quite some time.* (And of course, should the prediction of a $70 million gross prove overoptimistic as it just did for The Flash, well, the consequences of that need no enlargement here.)

Is there any hope at all for Indiana Jones 5 avoiding that outcome? I see little--but not nothing. One possible glimmer of hope is that as more critics have seen the film the overall response has become a bit more favorable--the Rotten Tomatoes score risen from 50 to 66 percent. Admittedly that is still not very impressive, with the more favorable later reviews possibly just a matter of people saying "Well, it's not that bad." But it is something a little more positive than what we heard before, especially should it betoken audiences proving a little more generous, and maybe good word-of-mouth bringing more viewers in subsequent weeks--and the film having sufficiently decent legs to make the film's final take merely a disappointment rather than a disaster. Still, I have to admit that, especially given what is known about the content of the movie itself (The Super Mario Bros. Movie defied the critics to become a mega-hit, but this just does not look like that kind of crowd-pleaser), and the way in which the summer has been going, I would not expect too much.

* In real terms even $70 million is half of what Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull pulled in back in 2008 (about $140 million in May 2023 dollars).

The Little Mermaid: Box Office Gross: The Fifth Weekend--and the Upcoming Sixth

During the run of The Little Mermaid some analysts found it useful to compare the film's domestic run to that of 2019's Aladdin--the next-to-last of Disney's animated-classic-to-live-action adaptations, which likewise came out Memorial Day, and I have tended to use the comparison (in current, not real, dollars) as part of my basis for making calculations about the film's likely gross.

As it happened The Little Mermaid opened a little stronger--with $95.6 million taken in in its first three days, and $118.8 million in its first four, as against $91.5 million and $116.8 million in the case of Aladdin. The result was the hope that, if the movie was already falling short of expectations domestically (to say nothing of internationally) it could overtop, or at least match, Aladdin's $356 million gross--which, even with the dollar worth a fifth less than it had been in 2019, would not look too shabby.

Alas, the gap between the two movies (again, without bothering with inflation) has steadily widened--and not in the new film's favor. Where The Little Mermaid was running almost 4.5 percent ahead of Aladdin at the end of the first three days, my extrapolations from the data have its lead down to 0.8 percent by the second weekend and turning increasingly negative afterward--1.5 percent lower by the third weekend, 4.2 percent by the fourth, and 6.4 percent by the fifth, when it had $270 million grossed, as against Aladdin's nearly $289 million.

In short, the film's opening a little bigger (even if it was just in current dollars) has been more than offset by its faster fade at the box office, which seems likely to continue this weekend. Boxoffice Pro anticipates the movie making a mere $4.4 million over the Friday-to-Sunday period, which would leave it with just under $280 million banked--as against the almost $307 million Aladdin had, widening the gap from 6.4 to 8.7 percent.

Previously considering the film my guess had been that its final gross would be in the range of $300-$350 million. At the current rate I still expect it to break past $300 million, but the faster fade makes its getting anywhere near $350 million a long shot now. Instead I think even $325 million out of reach, the lower half of the $300-$350 million range where it will end up.*

Meanwhile the international markets continue to offer little succor--the $230 million taken there to date amounting to just 46 percent of the global gross. Getting it past the half billion dollar mark (and thus into the $500-$700 million range I earlier anticipated), I would guess that if this does not improve the film's final take will be in the $550-$600 million range. Even by the lowered standard of a month ago it is not the happiest outcome that could have been anticipated for the film.

* Aladdin made 86 percent of its money by the sixth weekend. Should The Little Mermaid be at the same point in its trajectory after taking in $280 million as of Sunday one could expect $325 million when it finishes up--but the faster fade means one should assume it to have pulled in more than Aladdin had at the same point.

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse vs. Guardians of the Galaxy 3: After the Fourth Weekend, and Into the Fifth

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse is proving a rare instance these days of a sequel significantly outdoing its predecessor--performing, as one observer had it, more like a regular, live-action superhero movie with a comparison of Guardians of the Galaxy 3 making the point. Spider-Man opened a little bigger--with a gross of almost $121 million to Guardians of the Galaxy 3's $118 million--and afterward actually widened its lead, such that it has in the subsequent three weekends generally stayed 5 percent ahead of where the Guardians of the Galaxy sequel was at the same point in its trajectory. (Thus as of last weekend Spider-Man had $317 million grossed, against the $300 million that Guardians of the Galaxy had managed as of its own fourth weekend.)

Moreover, going by Boxoffice Pro's projection--the movie's taking in $340 million by Sunday--would mean this continuing, the movie still about 5 percent ahead of Guardians of the Galaxy 3 in its fifth weekend (by which it had grossed just $323 million). The fact that the weekend is another holiday weekend would seem likely to add to its edge, boosting its gross to $346.5 million by its 34th day in release (as against Guardians' $326 million at the same point), working out to a 6 percent margin of difference.

All that being the case, even with Guardians of the Galaxy 3 benefiting from surprisingly strong holds late in its run (which will see it triple its opening weekend gross this weekend, and finish up in the vicinity of $360 million) it still seems easy to picture Spider-Man edging it out at the end. Given that Guardians of the Galaxy 3 seems likely to be the highest-grossing live-action superhero movie of the year (especially given the debacle The Flash proved to be, and the questionable prospects of Captain Marvel 2 and Aquaman) I still expect the animated Spider-Man film to be the highest-grossing superhero movie of 2023 domestically. (The global winner in the stakes is another matter, given that Spider-Man, if doing better than its predecessor internationally, has just not caught on abroad the same way--though I will be revisiting that matter in an upcoming post.)

Subscribe Now: Feed Icon